Nice write-up of this position, Erik. I'm of the same persuasion.

I've seen the same thing in the R world, between different dialects. I even wrote a piece comparing one approach (the “tidyverse”) to a kitchen full of gadgets — v. using a chef knife (data.table).

I also saw something similar when I worked in graphic design. There were tool people, who loved add-ons for Photoshop that would save them 10 seconds each, but cost them 2 hours to update and implement in total; versus the people who would just wing it with the tools included, and not worry.

There are some interesting implications for teaching / learning languages too. I think the simplicity approach is far better -- you can learn concepts then, and not baroque tools that you might never need in your particular career.

Data, graphics, games. So You Need to Learn R.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Jasper McChesney

Jasper McChesney

Data, graphics, games. So You Need to Learn R.

More from Medium

A Review of the Showcase of the 2021 Stray Birds Dance Platform

A Brief Description of WoWarriors

Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age

The Internet Paradox: A Sphere of Contradictions

Copyright [Victoria Heath] https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1521175776577-f8e0c1e5ecb7?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&ixid=MnwxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHx8&auto=format&fit=crop&w=970&q=80